Wait, when did democracy get redefined
I tire of having to listen to some people coming up with bollocks about democracy as though they have a God given right to be the arbiter of what democracy actually is. Whether this is bald headed failed political ex-leaders fawning over bumbling fuckwits getting ready to lead the country into oblivion or extreme right wing fascist thugs berating hapless and to be honest, totally incompetent journalists about how he is being victimised for being a fucked up bully who has made a life and living out of being a twat. I'm sure all this is good for the hordes of like minded simpletons that watch eagerly for the next instalment while masturbating like a pack of deranged monkeys waiting for bananas to ripen but I'm sure as fuck that it is nothing to do with democracy.
When half a dozen good old boys down the local blue rinse club quaff back on their mugs of Pinot and debate the pros and cons of a couple of public school fucktards while their wives say 'yes dear, that's right' and glance nervously but smugly at the token in the corner of the bar while seeming to see no irony in their obvious distaste in general gayness when most of them went to same sex boarding schools were nothing of that sort ever happened at all, especially nothing involving a biscuit and certainly not a soggy one at that.
And these twatburgers get to pick a leader of a country that is the equivalent, in Premier League terms, of Brighton and Hove Albion but thinking it's still Man City or Utd or Liverpool. But it aint and no amount of wishing it will make it happen whether they click their collective glittery red, or maybe that should be blue, shoes together and wish it or not.
So asking for a democratic process to check on another democratic process is not some complicated maths problem whereby one democratic process is definitely democratic but two democratic processes somehow negate each other and open up wormholes where the hole universe implodes and LadyT suddenly reappears from a long since closed coalmine. It's just fucking democracy, whereas LadyT reappearing would be more demagoguery!
Plus, stating that freedom of speech is something that overrides the law where the law has only stated as much in the name of fairness and to ensure proper due process is not the same as burning all the books by JK Rowling then hunting her down and impaling her on particularly sharp wand. Or is it. Anyway, coming from a dickwad who has pictures of a jumped up mass murdering holocaust inciting raving loony corporal on his bedroom ceiling is a bit rich really. If memory serves me right that particular cult figure had a penchant for the occasional book burning followed by putting a bullet through the head of any still living, and in reach, authors!
Oh well, I'm sure it'll all turn out ok in the end, anyway, Wimbledon is on and the serenity of that event is very calming, well, except when a certain couple of highly strung overly testosterone driven guys get together and make a bit of a fuss.
When half a dozen good old boys down the local blue rinse club quaff back on their mugs of Pinot and debate the pros and cons of a couple of public school fucktards while their wives say 'yes dear, that's right' and glance nervously but smugly at the token in the corner of the bar while seeming to see no irony in their obvious distaste in general gayness when most of them went to same sex boarding schools were nothing of that sort ever happened at all, especially nothing involving a biscuit and certainly not a soggy one at that.
And these twatburgers get to pick a leader of a country that is the equivalent, in Premier League terms, of Brighton and Hove Albion but thinking it's still Man City or Utd or Liverpool. But it aint and no amount of wishing it will make it happen whether they click their collective glittery red, or maybe that should be blue, shoes together and wish it or not.
So asking for a democratic process to check on another democratic process is not some complicated maths problem whereby one democratic process is definitely democratic but two democratic processes somehow negate each other and open up wormholes where the hole universe implodes and LadyT suddenly reappears from a long since closed coalmine. It's just fucking democracy, whereas LadyT reappearing would be more demagoguery!
Plus, stating that freedom of speech is something that overrides the law where the law has only stated as much in the name of fairness and to ensure proper due process is not the same as burning all the books by JK Rowling then hunting her down and impaling her on particularly sharp wand. Or is it. Anyway, coming from a dickwad who has pictures of a jumped up mass murdering holocaust inciting raving loony corporal on his bedroom ceiling is a bit rich really. If memory serves me right that particular cult figure had a penchant for the occasional book burning followed by putting a bullet through the head of any still living, and in reach, authors!
Oh well, I'm sure it'll all turn out ok in the end, anyway, Wimbledon is on and the serenity of that event is very calming, well, except when a certain couple of highly strung overly testosterone driven guys get together and make a bit of a fuss.
Comments
Post a Comment